The Blevinses Begin to Wonder

 

    The Blevinses were planning their near-term future on Denise’s promise that the adoption would be completed in six months, but Denise and Valeri failed to mention that that only began when the documents hit the Ministry of Health. They were going under the belief that the process began when the first visit to the child was made.

 

    They were told to keep off the Internet and received the infamous “Lurking Bulgarians” email. But Dorothy was on both the Topica and EEAC Bulgaria lists. She was fed the line from Denise that everyone posting on the listservs were liars — and to never believe any information obtained from them.

  

    For this reason, she seldom, if ever, posted and if she did post, she never mentioned the agency she was using on either the Topica or EEAC Bulgaria lists.

 

    In October, the Blevins were offered to place Maria in foster care for $150 a month. To their (and our) knowledge, they were the only BBAS family to be offered this option. 

 

    Denise assured them that Dr. Panova had told her that under Bulgarian law, it would be legal for Maria to go home with her primary caregiver, Annie.

 

    The $150 was Annie’s salary and would allow Annie to stay at home with Maria and her own two children. Once Maria was adopted, Annie’s job would be held for her and she could resume her work at the orphanage. The $150 per month did not cover other expenses such as food, formula, clothing and toys.

 

    The Blevinses decided not to place Maria in foster care. They were still under the belief that Maria would be home by January or February and did not want Maria to become unnecessarily bonded with her leyala.

 

     Additionally, $150 monthly plus expenses was more than they were able to afford.

 

    By November, the Blevinses’ homestudy and most of their dossier was completed. They still believed Maria would be home in six months. Or sooner. 

    

    Prior to the papers being signed — the contract in this case — they were told the adoption would be a fast, expedited one. But adoptions aren’t frequently expedited in Bulgaria, as they were to learn.

 

    They began asking Denise directly what they could do for orphanage support in Buzovgrad. They asked what the orphanage needed and how they could raise funds for the children.

 

    They attempted, as Dorothy recalls, “to get videos, pictures, and a ‘needs’ list,” all to no avail. This seemed strange, for Denise wanted to help the Blevinses “let the money filter through her” but “she did not want to do anything to provide the information that we needed to actually raise the money.”

 

    All that was provided were three scanned photos of the kitchen. Not much to go on.

 

    As soon as their paperwork hit BBAS, their case got temporarily “transferred” to Wendy Stamper. Wendy, the kind trusting soul that every client relied on for the truth, told them straight up that a quick adoption would be great, but to plan on the long haul. The long haul turned out to be a 14 month month wait.

 

    Wendy was good at one thing: reading through the paperwork.

 

    In fact, one of the few things BBAS did do well was update clients on their paperwork. Wendy took the time out and read their homestudy and the other documents the day after she got them. Perhaps the agency actually had learned something from our experience.

 

    “Every single time that I had a question she was right there to answer all of our questions!” Dorothy wrote to us later. However, once Wendy was transferred to handling the Russian program, they again had to deal with Denise.  Communications would hit a brick wall.

 

    Later on they were to learn through another client that Denise had allegedly arranged for Maria to have a “personal caregiver,” but no evidence that Maria was getting “personal care” while in Buzovgrad was ever presented to them.

  

     Denise had told them that she was paying for physical therapy, but their pediatrician had requested no attempts be made for Maria to even attempt walking.  The pediatrician felt that the less mobile Maria was, the less precious calories she would need to burn. They requested instead that Maria’s cognitive skills be worked on.

   

     Denise told Dorothy that the staff in Buzovgrad wouldn’t go for not attempting to get Maria walking. Who knows what was going on there for her?

 

    They found out that their documents were in Bulgaria on Nov. 24. They would be entered into the Ministry of Health on Dec. 20, almost a month later.

 

    During her orphanage relief trek in December, Denise mentioned she had made a video. Yet she told them there was very little footage of Maria on the tape for Maria was in a bad mood the day it was shot. She was not on the video for very long because she had been removed from where the video was being shot.

 

   Some families received more video footage than others. One client was told repeatedly that footage of her daughter from another orphanage would be in the mail, but Denise kept putting her off and never sent it.

 

    The same went for the Blevinses. Dorothy, attempting to be nice, was regularly sending Denise nicey-nice email messages in order to get on to Denise’s good side to get the videotape of Maria.

 

     Denise relented. When Dorothy got the videotape, sure enough there all of 30 seconds of Maria. Just that tiny snippet of their daughter to keep their family going through the holidays.

 

     There was also 60 seconds of footage of the decrepit orphanage kitchen, nothing worth using for a fund raising event.

 

    But Dorothy Blevins, once Maria came home, did make a difference in Buzovgrad.  She teamed up with an AIAA Buzovgrad mom by the name of Jill Tate.  Jill created her own organization called Bright Futures Foundation to help the children left behind.  In 2003, Dorothy managed to help raise funds for the kitchen's refurbishment.  With all of Denise's promises, sad sales talk about the kitchen, it was adoptive parents who got things moving. Not an adoption agency. 

 

    Here is what was accomplished in the Buzovgrad orphanage in j2003:

http://www.brightfuturesfoundation.net/files/programs.html

Buzovgrad Kitchen Project

Our featured project is the remodeling of the kitchen at the orphanage in Buzovgrad, Bulgaria. When we started this project, the kitchen was in such a state of disrepair that the health department had threatened to close it down.

The photos below show various places around the kitchen. At right is the team who worked on the project, including translators and drivers, as well as some of the staff and children.

Thank you to everyone who contributed to this project, which has certainly helped to improve the lives of these children.

 

 

    By late January 2001, doubts were beginning to creep into the Blevinses’ minds about the Bulgarian adoption process.

 

    Updates on Maria were few. If and when they got updates, they were always that Maria is fine, Maria can stand, send the formula so it can be sent with a traveling family. They still hadn’t gotten a timeline from Denise or anybody at BBAS.

    Dorothy noticed the posts that we and the Corrigans had made to the EEAC Bulgaria list, naming our adoption agency. Neither us nor the Corrigans had anything good to say about BBAS.  

    When Dorothy questioned Denise about our negative BBAS posts, Denise downplayed our experiences and told her that we were both disgruntled families without causes — it was all the process! It was all the Bulgarian government’s fault!  They were a professional agency and Valeri and Mr. Dobrev were doing all they could!  

    They cared about the children! Just let the process work!

    Having had enough of the lack of information, on Jan. 30, 2001, Dorothy bit the bullet and contacted us, after having first contacted Sue Corrigan. Sue told her to email us, and this is what she said.

Elizabeth,  My name is Dorothy Blevins and my husband and I are adopting  a little girl (she  was 2 in Aug) from Bulgaria through Building Blocks.  I have seen from the board that you also used Building Blocks for your adoption and Sue Corrigan also said that you used Building Blocks.  I have been meaning to call Sue but by the time I get everything done that the kids need me to take care of it is just too late even with the time difference!  I told Sue that I was satisfied with Building Blocks at the time that we were e-mailing but since that time I have started to grow rather concerned!  I never thought at the beginning of the adoption process that I would need their support but I am finding that I really do and I have so many questions that I can't seem to get them to have any amount of concern that I am so in need of some answers! 

My questions to you are:  

How long did your adoption take from the time your dossier was in Bulgaria?

How many updates and videos and photos did you receive or better how often?

Were you able to ask questions and get answers through Building Blocks on things you thought you would need to know when you returned to Bulgaria?

Did you use any other means to try to get information on your child?

Did you ever call the orphanage yourself?  

Please, do not forward this to anyone because we are in the middle of our adoption and I don't want anything to stop the progress which seems to be going in reverse anyway!  If there is anything that you could tell me to shed light on what in the world is going on I would greatly appreciate  it.  If you would prefer not to help just e-mail me and say you would rather not answer because I really could understand that.

   

    We sent a very long response, giving her the full scoop about BBAS and then some, with our address and telephone number attached.  

    Within minutes of receiving our reply about Cyril and Anguel’s adoption, our telephone rang. It was Dorothy Blevins.

    After a lengthy telephone conversation, we mailed her copies of the Bulgarian timeline we were given, the letter exchange with Richard J. Marco Jr., the email exchange in September 2000 where Denise demanded her money and a copy of our signed contract with BBAS in March 1999. 

     The day after contacting us, the Blevinses finally received the following timeline from Denise. 

    Note how each stage is issued in “weeks” instead of “months.” Denise wrote: “Please note your timeline expresses that your documents will remain in the MOH in Sofia for 3 months.”

 

            Translation and Authentication of Docs                                2 wks

            Signature of Orphanage Director                                          2 wks

            Signature of Regional Ministry of Health                               2 wks

            Ministry of Health in Sofia                                                       10 wks

            Ministry of Justice                                                                    4 wks

            Documents Await Court Date                                                2 wks

            Court Date – Judge has 14 days to write Decree               2 wks

            Validity of Adoption Decree                                                   2 wks

            Police Issue Adoption Documents                                        1 wk

            Passport Issuance                                                                   2 wks

    When they counted out the weeks, they came up with seven months, three weeks — not the six months promised. 

    When they confronted Denise on this glaring inconsistency of what they were originally told,  she evaded the question and the outright lie she told them at the beginning: “Yes because Maria is special needs the timeline should be shorter. But I am telling you from experience that one should always plan longer then shorter.”

    Denise callously added this: “This is why we donated funds to get your homestudy done so we could assist you in getting the process started. We have expedited everything on our end, we assisted you with finances to expedite documents on your end, sadly it is now up to the Bulgarian gov’t to do there job.”

    The Blevinses had appreciated the $680 translation fee loan. What they DID NOT appreciate was Denise rubbing that loan in their faces. What did the loan have to do with the let down of knowing their daughter wouldn’t be home when Denise had alleged she would?

    They especially did not appreciate they were being given no useful information on their future daughter’s health. It had been three months since they had traveled to Bulgaria, and Denise was not giving them useful information on Maria’s well being.

    Parents do tend to get concerned about these things, especially when their children are special needs.

    Dorothy was sending formula to Maria, to build her strength. Their pediatrician was very, very concerned about it.

    Since Maria was so tiny they wanted to know if the formula they were sending was benefiting her. Was she drinking the formula they had been sending at Denise’s request? Was this fulfilling her nutritional requirements and was this helping her to gain weight?

    They decided to call Dr. Panova. They had been given Valeri Kamenov’s information — his email, his cell phone and local phone number — on a sheet before they traveled, but not Dr. Panova’s contact information — not even her email.

    They called information to obtain the number of the orphanage in Buzovgrad.  At first, they got the number for the hospital in Buzovgrad, but by their second call, they got Dr. Panova’s office.  

    Dr. Panova wasn’t in. They tried again, but she had just left.

   No need to say how this was going over at THE BLOCKS.

    On Feb. 1, Gary Blevins informed Denise that they were attempting to call Dr. Panova. Denise told him that Dr. Panova’s father was ill and therefore, she could not get any updates. The only person who could legally update anyone about the girl was from Dr. Panova.

    Denise again told the Blevins to send anything and everything to BBAS so it could be “hand carried” to Valeri. Denise told them that both Dr. Panova and Mr. Kamenov had requested that families only contact them through BBAS. 

    On Feb. 9, BBAS sent them an update on Maria at long last. One of their usual two-sentence specials that was supposed to set parents’ minds at ease.

    Basically, it gave the sunshine answer: Maria was now walking, feeding herself and playing. The Blevins wondered how her caloric intake was going — if the formula they were attempting to send was being given to her.

    Throughout the months of waiting, they were never given verification that Maria, or any child for that matter, was being given the formula. The best that Denise could offer them was Dr. Panova’s assurances that Maria was getting the formula. 

    But was she? No proof was ever provided Maria was receiving or benefiting from the formula. Dorothy would have been happy to know if any of the children were benefiting, if not Maria.

    From February to March, I was able to “introduce” Dorothy and Gary to other BBAS Buzovgrad families.

    I warned them, however, not to mention my name or to mention any problems with the agency.

    There was one family I got the Blevinses in contact with, a family I had been corresponding with for a very long time.

    This family was just great to the Blevinses and other clients. They got photos of Maria on two separate trips to Bulgaria visiting their kids and sent the photos right on to Gary and Dorothy. 

    Another BBAS Buzovgrad family supplied the Blevinses information on how the orphanage was run.  If it wasn’t for the support of fellow BBAS clients helping one another doing the things that the agency was supposed to do, the Blevinses would have been totally and utterly isolated during Maria’s adoption wait.

    Of course, when Dorothy asked Denise about the cancellations — Denise knew who had posted what to the EEAC Bulgaria list. She cautioned Dorothy not to post anything on the listservs or Internet because “the Bulgarians are watching! 

    But the only people “watching” were those working for the adoption industry in the United States.

Back Next