THE STORY DENISE HUBBARD AND BUILDING BLOCKS  DON’T WANT YOU TO READ!

 

This story, in her hometown paper, about Denise Hubbard’s adoption of her daughter Emily from Russia and how it led her to start her own adoption agency, had been posted on BBAS's web site under “Read Our Story” since the site’s inception in summer 1999.

But, in early 2002, we noticed it was no longer there. It had been replaced by this public relations boilerplate, written by Denise herself. 

She forgot to change the filename, though. But aren’t the pics of Emily cute?

Why? Perhaps it was simply the evolution of BBAS’s marketing and public relations strategy (although no sane marketing professional would have put out that “Attack of the Animated .GIFs” page, much less have them pervade the entire site. Then again, we’re talking about a woman who wasted two years trying to sell her own house here).

But it’s far more likely that Denise had finally realized how much damage it was inadvertently doing to her business and her credibility (such as it is).

At that point, the story of Cyril’s death, BBAS’s efforts to retaliate against us during Anguel’s adoption after we complained about their pattern of misrepresentation to clients to the ODHS had been public for over a year.

In both our FRUA postings and our ODHS complaint as reprinted at Mary Mooney’s site, we made reference to the contradiction between Denise’s Nov. 21, 1999, statement to us on the telephone in Perm that Emily had the same severe diaper rash we had just discovered on Cyril and what she is quoted as saying below on the same subject (see highlighted passage).

This was brought to our attention first by Linda Wright while we were still in Russia waiting to go home. When we later confirmed it, it was the first inkling we had that Denise was not totally on the up and up. Within two months, she had lost all her credibility with us.

We can only presume that other potential clients realized the same thing we did, and chose to put their money and adoption hopes in the care of better qualified and more ethical people.

Denise herself came to the same realization, conveniently enough, at or before the time of year when most people start their adoptions and are surfing through websites deciding who to use. (It was not the first time she’d posted inadvertently damaging material on her site and then taken it down, either).

The story is reprinted below as it originally was posted on BBAS’s site. The second highlighted passage is also good for a hoot or two, or three.

See the end of the story for Denise’s pitiful attempt to explain this away.

 

“Our Story”

 

As published in the Medina County Gazette, March 3, 1998

By PAUL S. WORKMAN Staff Writer

    MEDINA TWP. – The Hubbards just wanted a daughter, but with Emily Kathryn-Ann, they received more than they bargained for.

  Instead of merely finding a child, this Russian girl, now 11 months old, opened the eyes of Gary and Denise Hubbard to help the orphaned children of that country.

    “At first, we wanted a daughter, “ Gary said.  “Later it was about giving a needy child a good home.”  “It’s the best thing I’ve ever done; I enjoy it so much, “ said Denise, who is now helping 21 couples adopt through her company, Building Blocks Adoption Services, Inc.  “I’ve looked for something in life that we really like to do and I found it.”

    With challenges like the laid-back Russian bureaucracy and the language barrier, foreign adoption can be a difficult task, the couple said.  But it’s one that’s very worthwhile, said the Hubbards, who in December [1997] traveled about 800 miles east of Moscow to an orphanage in the Perm region of Russia to adopt Emily.

    They brought clothes, vitamins and other items for the children donated by local businesses and individuals. “If I had a big enough duffle bag, I would have brought all the children back,” Denise said.

    Unlike other countries, conditions in Russian orphanages are rather good, the Hubbards said.  But it isn’t quite like what Americans would be accustomed to.  For example, there are no diapers on the children.  They just find it easier to change clothes than deal with diapers, Denise said.

    The Russians the Hubbards met were proud of their country but also aware of their shortcomings.  “If a child can be brought up in a better home, they’re all for it,” Denise said.  “The only thing these children lack is love, their emotional needs,” she added.  “Love and parents – that’s what they need.”

    Due to the slow pace of American adoptions through the public sector (including a wait of up to eight years) and the expensive, potentially problematic private attorney route (rife with the fear that the birth mother would renege on her decision to place the child up for adoption and want the youngster back), the Hubbards opted for a foreign adoption.

    The couple, who has three boys but is medically unable to have more children, considered China and Korea, but decided against those countries because little information about the children is provided.  Russia looked much better, in part because Denise is of Russian decent.    

    The Russians offered some information, like the fact that Emily’s father is a driver and her college-educated mother is a 36-year-old secretary.  The two are divorced and were unable to afford Emily.  Their girl has three siblings, the Hubbards learned, who were also put up for adoption.  Their whereabouts and even their gender is unknown and likely to remain that way due to poor recordkeeping, but Denise is determined to find them, so Emily will know who her siblings are, they said.

    Giving Emily a family was a process that began in February 1997, when they began working with the Russian facilitator who would help them with the adoption.  They had many tasks ahead of them, including passing checks of the child abuse registry, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the state Bureau of Criminal Investigation; authorization from the Immigration and Naturalization Service; a fact-gathering on family finances and the home environment; and independent interviews of family members.

    The Hubbards wanted a girl who was as young as possible.  They first saw Emily on a videotape and the instant they saw her, they knew she was theirs, they said.  Once in Russia, they had the chance to meet Emily for the first time before the legal proceedings.  At which they knew they had made the right choice.  Denise remembers how alert Emily was and how she was just so happy!  At the meeting, the director of the orphange took the Hubbards on a tour, and Gary remembered thinking that he could not believe how the orphange was so clean and organized.  He noticed the abundance of toys and the paintings on the walls.  There were also children dressing for a morning walk in the snow.  Denise was amazed at how attentive the caregivers were with the children and how the young children were able to dress themselves, they seemed so independent, Denise said.

    That part of the process went smoothly, but they were sweating a little at the adoption hearing because the judge left the courtroom to consider their case when they believed he would grant their request on the spot.  But upon meeting the judge in her chambers, they realized that the paperwork was completed for their adoption in the absence of the judge.

    In Russia, they learned what a cockroach looks like [What? Denise never looks in the mirror?] and, in this land where it is dark from 4 p.m. to 9 a.m. and 2 feet of snow is often on the ground, they experienced heatwaves in the low 30s.

    The experience also taught them that foreign adoption isn’t cheap.  The Hubbards paid $17,000.  Adoptions can cost up to $28,000 or more from other resources, they found out.

    The high cost prompted Denise to charge $14,500 for her company’s adoptions, Denise said.  If she could do it for nothing she would, but she also understands that people need to be paid for their services, as well as supporting the orphanages.  The profit margin is slim, she said, adding, I’m not in it for the money.  I’m in it for the children.

    And what did the Hubbards do upon returning from Russia?  They went to Disney World, of course – a mere three days later.  They had planned the trip a year ago and it allowed for plenty of bonding, walking and playing together, Denise said.

    But even now, their adoption work isn’t over.  Five post-placement visits from an American social worker are required – after the third, sixth and ninth months, and the second and third years.

    Watching Emily – nicknamed “Dragonfly” at the orphanage because of her active nature – crawling on the floor alongside a crawling Minnie Mouse character, suggests she’s adapted rather well to life in the West.

    Clearly, the Hubbards and their sons are happy about this latest addition to the family.  Take it from Emily’s brother, Michael, 11, author of “Sweet Sweet Emily”, written for his mother.  “God gave us the greatest gift of all!  My sister,” he wrote.  “Thank you, God!”

    Denise’s advice to those contemplating an overseas adoption is this, “Don’t think about it, just do it.  If you can find a way to go on vacation, you can find a way to adopt a child.”  “What you’ll come back with is the greatest gift,” she said.  “Look what we brought back.”

 

Ugh. Enough already. You wanna see what we brought back? Or, more to the point, didn't?

We should add that Denise’s statement as reported above was confirmed for us by many people. First, as we said earlier, Cyril himself was not wearing a diaper in either of his referral videos.

Second, Linda Wright told us that during her brief visit to see Yekaterina in the orphanage, she wasn’t wearing a diaper either.

In fact, she says, “they had that outfit on that girl so tight she was getting a wedgie.”

We should note that these two girls were in the exact same orphanage as Cyril, too, as Simona Wirtz confirmed for us in the case of Emily.

Several posters responding to our FRUA posts that told the story also confirmed that their children, in other regions of Russia, had not worn diapers in their orphanages either, nor had they seen any other children in those facilities wearing diapers. We also saw someone else’s referral video which supported that, and we should also add that Elizabeth, accompanying a friend to yet another Russian orphanage later on, made the same observation.

So the preponderance of the evidence suggests that it is not standard operational procedure in Russian orphanages to diaper children.

It’s no surprise, then, that with this story in hand, it was one of the things Linda Saridakis of the ODHS confronted Denise about when she investigated our complaint.

Denise’s answer, apparently was to shift blame and imply that the reporter got it wrong. To quote from one of Linda’s letters to her about the case, reiterating Denise’s responses to our complaint:

You stated that the incident regarding your daughter and whether or not she was wearing a diaper must have been misunderstood. There were two incidents of visiting with your daughter in Russia and the first time she had a diaper on and the second time she did not.

We’re not quite sure if Linda bought it; we sure don’t. In her report, Linda adds that Denise claims she has a video to verify this (but she didn’t ask to see it).

First, not only both of Cyril’s referral videos but all the videos Denise showed Elizabeth when she visited her home in April 1999 showed children not wearing diapers. 

Second, why did she tell the reporter what she was paraphrased as saying; and if it was wrong why did she run it on her own website uncorrected? Even after we had cited this as proof of her perfidy in our FRUA posts when we finally shared the story with the greater Eastern European adoption community.

And even if it is true (and consider this in the context of Denise’s documented practice of responding to clients’ concerns about their prospective children’s medical problems with “Oh, Emily had that, too, and she’s OK now.”) there’s just no way that Emily could have gotten that kind of wretched diaper rash that Cyril had, as Denise claimed to us, if she was only wearing a diaper part of the time.

Besides the diapering issue, there are more than a few other things in this that cannot be allowed to pass without comment, too.

First, taking your newly-adopted child to Disney World is exactly what you should not do, to avoid overstimulating them, according to Dr. Ronald Federici, attachment expert, father of six children adopted from Eastern Europe and author of a widely-read book on the subject. So much for any advice Denise might have to offer you on parenting your new addition.

It’s also sort of funny that she describes the adoption as taking place through “a Russian facilitator.” Hmm ... why so circumspect, Denise? We think we know now ... (and, as usual, she left Simona Wirtz out of the picture).

Lastly but not leastly, note that she claims in the third graf to be helping 21 other families adopt.

This would be sort of a neat trick, considering that BBAS was still two months away from being licensed by ODHS at the time this story appeared. And it doesn’t square with what she was telling Linda Saridakis at the same time, trying to cajole her into letting her do adoptions before the licensing process was officially complete ... in those emails, she says she has three waiting families.

Yet another instance of Denise Hubbard talking out of both sides of her mouth.